Awards June 24, 2019
Online Sales Tax 101
Companies that sell on the web are now required to collect sales tax in many states. Is your promo firm following the rules?
This is a guest column by Alyssa Mertes, Quality Logo Products (302967).
In the world of promotional products, things are always changing at a lightning-fast rate. Take your SEO for example. One minute you could be in the top five search results on Google, the next you’re hiding somewhere on page 14. The thing is, though, search engine rankings are only one of the many challenges we face as distributors and suppliers.
Lately, our collective attention has shifted to the 2018 ruling in Wayfair v. South Dakota, a landmark case that has completely changed the rules of sales tax for online companies. Wayfair doesn’t just affect those of us in the promo market. Any e-commerce company, from Amazon to Zappos, is required to collect sales tax as determined by the state to which the items are being delivered.
What does that even mean? How does it affect you? It’s time to boil this all down, and while we’re at it, let’s see if our industry is remitting tax correctly and keeping up with all these changes.
Understanding the Wayfair Case
The Wayfair decision was prompted by officials in South Dakota, who claimed their state was losing upwards of $48 million a year. The genesis of the shortfall was from sales tax that wasn’t being collected from online orders shipping into their state. Other states joined in the case against Wayfair, a home goods e-seller that was well known for not collecting sales taxes from customers on purchases.
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Dakota. Previously, companies only had to collect sales tax if they had property or employees in the state to which the order was being shipped. Now, all states were given the option to determine their own laws on collecting sales tax from online orders.
Wayfair & Promo
Our industry has a bit of work to do when it comes to properly displaying sales tax on our respective websites. Consider some sales tax data that our analytics team at Quality Logo collected over the course of two years.
In July of 2017 – prior to the Wayfair ruling – an order was placed on the websites of 37 different distributors, with the shipments going to five different states. The tax amounts were verified and confirmed by Avalara, a software firm that provides tax compliance tools for e-commerce companies. The same product was ordered on every website: a color-changing stadium cup. The orders were shipped to Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, Oklahoma and Vermont.
These were the results:
• Only five distributors showed the correct tax amount.
• 30 distributors showed some kind of tax, but 23 displayed it incorrectly. The other seven listed the amount as “$0.”
• Two distributors didn’t show an amount for tax at all.
Again, this was tested before Wayfair, but the tax amount should still have been displayed correctly. About 62% of the distributors tested weren’t displaying an accurate amount on their websites. Still, that’s not as concerning as the two distributors that didn’t have an amount listed at all.
In January of 2019 – seven months after Wayfair went into effect – an order was placed on the website of 24 different distributors with the shipments going to six different states. The tax amount was determined by the economic thresholds post-Wayfair (see chart). The product ordered was either the color-changing stadium cup or a pair of rubberized sunglasses. The orders were shipped to Connecticut, Indiana, South Carolina, Nevada, Colorado and Maryland.
These were the results:
• 15 distributors didn’t show a tax amount at any stage of the order process.
• The nine that did show sales tax weren’t displaying an accurate amount as determined post-Wayfair.
• Not one distributor showed the correct tax for all six states.
It’s fair to assume that many of these distributors, a few among the largest in the promo industry, have met the thresholds determined by each state. With that in mind, they should have a correct tax amount displayed on their websites. Still, 62.5% of these distributors didn’t have a tax amount listed at any point during the order.
“All states have the option to determine their own laws when it comes to collecting sales tax from online orders.”
In May of 2019 – with Wayfair in effect for almost a year – the same rubberized sunglasses or mood stadium cup were ordered from the same 24 distributors as in January of 2019. The shipments went to the same six states and nothing changed in terms of economic thresholds.
Across the board, distributors were still struggling with showing the sales tax correctly on their websites, with a few exceptions per state. At this point, Wayfair had been in effect for close to a year, but the chart below shows that not much has changed in terms of distributors correctly displaying sales tax on their respective websites.
State | # of distributors showing correct sales tax January 2019 |
# of distributors showing correct sales tax May 2019 |
Change |
---|---|---|---|
Colorado | 3 | 0 | 100% decrease |
South Carolina | 5 | 1 | 80% decrease |
Connecticut | 7 | 10 | 43% increase |
Nevada | 3 | 4 | 33% increase |
Indiana | 8 | 9 | 13% increase |
Maryland | 5 | 6 | 20% increase |
There was some improvement in most of the states in terms of displaying an accurate tax amount. However, Colorado and South Carolina inexplicably had fewer distributors showing the tax amount correctly. Clearly, this is concerning.
The main takeaway from all three sets of data is that properly displaying sales tax has always been a struggle in our industry. It was the case before Wayfair and continues to be an obstacle even now that new thresholds are in effect.
Time to Take Action
As a distributor, you should take steps now to understand the post-Wayfair thresholds and update your website accordingly. Aside from the possibility of audits, you can find yourself in a less-than-favorable position with customers if you don’t follow the thresholds per state.
Consider what happened to Newegg.com, for example. According to a report by Channel 3 Eyewitness News, customers of the online retailer, which sells consumer electronics and hardware, unexpectedly received letters in the mail in 2018 from Connecticut’s Department of Revenue. The state was looking for sales tax money from purchases made in 2014 to 2016, and Newegg’s customers were being asked to foot the bill. Notably, this was three months before the United States even reached their decision in Wayfair.
Obviously, you don’t want to find yourself in the same spot as Newegg. With software options like Avalara and the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board working on a way to make things easier, it’s up to all of us in the promo products industry to do our due diligence and properly display tax across the board. If not, you could find yourself in a “bait and switch” situation where customers believe they’re paying less, only to be charged more for sales tax down the road.
Being proactive today will save you a lot of headaches in the long run and make things easier for your customers.
Now Collecting
Here are the collection thresholds for companies as set by each state. While the laws are still new, it’s likely that by the end of 2020, every state that collects sales tax will have a system in place to monitor their laws and ensure e-commerce companies are following the rules.
State | Collection thresholds for online firms after Wayfair |
---|---|
Alabama | $250K in sales |
Alaska | No states sales tax |
Arizona | No guidance yet |
Arkansas | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
California | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Colorado | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Connecticut | $250K in sales AND 200 transactions |
Delaware | No states sales tax |
District of Columbia | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Florida | No guidance yet |
Georgia | $250K in sales OR at least 200 transactions |
Hawaii | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Idaho | Referral agreement with Idaho retailer AND $10K sales |
Illinois | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Indiana | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Iowa | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Kansas | No guidance yet |
Kentucky | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Louisiana | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Maine | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Maryland | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Massachusetts | $500K in sales AND 100 transactions |
Michigan | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Minnesota | $100K in 10 transactions OR 100 total transactions |
Mississippi | $250K in sales |
Missouri | No guidance yet |
Montana | No state sales tax |
Nebraska | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Nevada | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
New Hampshire | No state sales tax |
New Jersey | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
New Mexico | No guidance yet |
New York | $300K in sales AND 100+ transactions |
North Carolina | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
North Dakota | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Ohio | $500K sales |
Oklahoma | $10K sales |
Oregon | No state sales tax |
Pennsylvania | $100K in sales |
Rhode Island | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
South Carolina | $100K in sales |
South Dakota | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Tennessee | Pending approval by state legislature |
Texas | Guidance expected late 2019 |
Utah | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Vermont | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Virginia | No guidance yet |
Washington | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
West Virginia | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Wisconsin | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
Wyoming | $100K in sales OR 200+ transactions |
*Data courtesy of White and Williams LLP; whiteandwilliams.com